So if they cant get lighter, then they will make them faster in other ways, like stiffness or aerodynamics. Well, it turns out aerodynamics has much more to do with the riders position than minor frame shape tweaks.
So they turned to stiffness.
Integrated seat posts were the hot item of 2007. They were supposed to reduce any movement causef by the rider rocking on the saddle, and keep the pedal stroke more efficient. But they turned out to be better to look at, than ride. The the ISP bikes are notorious for the harsh ride, severe inconvenience in fitting, re-sale, and shipping.The trend of BB30 (oversize thread-less bottom bracket standard) is really nothing new...kids have been hammering bearings directly into their BMX frames for years, and Cannondale and Klein have been using the concept for a while as well. But in the last couple years, manufactures have really grasped the full potential, making super sized downtubes to bond with the bottom bracket, as well as beefed up chainstays. The wider 30mm crank spindle, lack of threaded interface, and oversized frame tubes have improved stiffness significantly.
Somewhat related to the BB30 convention is the oversized/tapered headtube. A larger downtube makes a better connection with the larger headtube. The larger headtube requires a larger fork, and bearings--up to 1.5 inches. All increasing stiffness.
So the industry has been driven by stiffness to obtain maximum power transfer, so what is the next step?
This got me thinking.....
Mountain bikes have benefited from through axle forks (over 9mm quick release) like this FOX 15mm version. The front wheel transfers loads in many different directions. The through axle is amazingly stiff interface compared to the QR. So much so, that I wonder how it would perform for a road bike???




1 comments:
I wonder indeed... maybe it's up to you to design the first!!
Post a Comment